Editorial Feature

Anti-Drone Measures being Tested

Militaries and law enforcement agencies are currently testing measures to neutralize flying drones and several different approaches are being evaluated, including the use of Patriot missiles and high-tech rifles that shoot radio signals.

Shooting drones out of the sky with a conventional weapon causes two major problems. First, it destroys the drone, which may need to be recovered for legal or forensic reasons. Second, a drone falling out of the sky could cause damage to property.

In the central Chinese city of Wuhan, police have been issued rifles that send out radio signals that send the drones into a controlled decent, sending them slowly to the ground without being destroyed. The rifles are able to bring the drones down by sending radio signals that are identical to the ones the drones use to talk to their control device, typically between the 2.4GHz and 5.8GHz frequency ranges.

During tests, Wuhan police were able to pull six drones out of the sky up to a kilometre away. The new technology doesn't come cheap, priced at about $36,000 per rifle.

The unauthorised use of drones has disturbed airport security in China, along with large-scale events, the Wuhan police have pointed out. A few months ago, a drone pilot in Hangzhou was charged with flying a drone too close to airliners, and three operators were recently arrested in Hong Kong for flying a drone over a racing event.

The recent tests staged by the Wuhan police were put on ahead of 2017 Wuhan Marathon, where aerial drones could threaten both spectators and participants.

The Chinese rifles are similar to ones developed by the US company DroneShield and a number of other civilian efforts are also currently underway to deal with the illegal operation of UAVs, including net-firing bazookas and birds of prey trained to grab them in flight.

While it probably won’t be a realistic countermeasure, one Western military has successfully shot down a small, commercial quadcopter with a $3 million Patriot missile, US Gen. David Perkins recently told a military symposium.

Patriot missiles are radar-guided, capable of travelling at five times the speed of sound and typically used to shoot down other ballistic missiles. They are currently stationed by the US military in 12 different countries including Germany, Israel, Japan and Saudi Arabia.

The Patriot test did reveal that the missile’s radar system was capable of identifying something as small as a quadcopter drone.

"That quadcopter that cost 200 bucks from Amazon.com did not stand a chance against a Patriot," Perkins said.

The test comes amidst reports of battlefield combatants attaching weapons to quadcopter drones. However, the massive cost disparity between the typical quadcopter and a Patriot missile is not only a disincentive for militaries, using the missiles for this purpose would actually be an incentive for others to start using more drones.

"In fact, if I'm the enemy, I'm thinking, 'Hey, I'm just gonna get on eBay and buy as many of these $300 quadcopters as I can and expend all the Patriot missiles out there',” Perkins said.

Speaking with BBC News, Justin Bronk, a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute, said the overkill of using a Patriot missile to shoo down a drone does emphasize the new challenge that militaries face in combating non-conventional combatants.

"It certainly exposes in very stark terms the challenge which militaries face in attempting to deal with the adaptation of cheap and readily available civilian technology with extremely expensive, high-end hardware designed for state-on-state warfare,” Bronk said.

Image Credit: Shutterstock.com/studioworkstock

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.

Brett Smith

Written by

Brett Smith

Brett Smith is an American freelance writer with a bachelor’s degree in journalism from Buffalo State College and has 8 years of experience working in a professional laboratory.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Smith, Brett. (2017, March 20). Anti-Drone Measures being Tested. AZoRobotics. Retrieved on April 18, 2024 from https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=213.

  • MLA

    Smith, Brett. "Anti-Drone Measures being Tested". AZoRobotics. 18 April 2024. <https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=213>.

  • Chicago

    Smith, Brett. "Anti-Drone Measures being Tested". AZoRobotics. https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=213. (accessed April 18, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Smith, Brett. 2017. Anti-Drone Measures being Tested. AZoRobotics, viewed 18 April 2024, https://www.azorobotics.com/Article.aspx?ArticleID=213.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this article?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.