Once used almost exclusively for military purposes, drones have rapidly entered civilian life. Today, they're deployed in policing, logistics, environmental research, journalism, and more. Their low cost, agility, and ability to access hard-to-reach areas make them highly effective tools. But as drones become a fixture in both public and private spaces, they raise several ethical and operational questions that current laws and policies are still struggling to address.
Image Credit: aerogondo2/Shutterstock.com
Download your PDF copy now!
The number of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), drones or other air vehicles operating as Innovative Air Mobility (IAM) is growing and being used for many different applications, bringing huge benefits to our societies. But to make sure they are safe and can reach their full innovative potential as an industry, we need them to be operated under certain rules so that they are safe as well as other manned aircraft and people and property on the ground that surrounds them.
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) on Ethical Drone Use
This article highlights five key areas of concern regarding drone surveillance: privacy, data security, consent, transparency, and the risks of bias in deployment.
1. Privacy Invasion
Drones challenge traditional notions of personal privacy in ways that fixed surveillance systems do not. Outfitted with high-resolution cameras, infrared sensors, and sometimes even audio recording tools, drones can bypass fences, windows, and walls to observe people in spaces where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy.
What makes drones particularly concerning is their mobility and subtlety. They can silently hover at high altitudes or navigate narrow urban corridors, making them difficult to detect. This allows operators to conduct surveillance without physical trespassing—and often without the subject’s knowledge at all.
While existing laws address some forms of voyeurism and trespass, they were not written with aerial surveillance in mind. As a result, drone-related privacy violations often fall into legal gray areas. For instance, is it illegal to record someone in their backyard from 200 feet in the air? What about through a window from a drone parked just outside private airspace? These are the kinds of nuanced questions that current privacy laws are ill-equipped to answer.
Addressing this issue will require updated legislation that reflects the capabilities of modern surveillance tools, not just where they can fly, but what they can see.
2. Data Misuse and Security
Drones are data collection platforms. They can capture images, map environments, track movement, and, increasingly, gather metadata and biometric information. While this data has clear benefits for things like emergency response and infrastructure analysis, it also creates substantial risks when collected and stored without robust safeguards.
The path from collection to storage to usage is often opaque. In some cases, drone footage may be retained indefinitely, analyzed using third-party software, or even sold to advertisers or data brokers, especially in commercial or corporate contexts. With minimal regulation over drone-collected data, individuals may have no idea how long their information is stored, who has access to it, or how it may be used in the future.
Security is another concern. Many consumer and commercial drones transmit data to cloud-based platforms or remote servers, some of which are located in foreign countries with differing privacy laws. This opens the door to unauthorized access, surveillance by foreign entities, or simple data leaks due to weak encryption or insufficient cybersecurity protocols.
Without strict rules on data retention, access control, and encryption, the growing volume of drone-generated data risks being misused in ways that are difficult to track or reverse.
3. Lack of Consent and Public Awareness
One of the defining features of drone surveillance is its often invisible nature. Unlike traditional CCTV systems—where cameras are mounted, labeled, and relatively easy to spot—drones can operate without any visual markers, signage, or audible cues. As a result, individuals frequently do not know they are being observed.
This lack of awareness raises serious questions around consent. People cannot opt out of being recorded if they don’t know it’s happening, and in most cases, there are no legal requirements for drone operators to notify those under observation. This is particularly problematic in residential areas, public parks, or protest settings, where expectations of anonymity and freedom of movement are high.
The ethical dilemma here revolves around informed participation. In digital spaces, users at least encounter privacy policies or consent banners. In physical environments monitored by drones, there is rarely any equivalent mechanism. This undermines the ability of individuals to make informed choices about their exposure to surveillance.
Clearer public signage, disclosure requirements, or even geofencing alerts could provide a basic level of informed consent. Without such measures, drone surveillance risks becoming a silent layer of observation embedded into daily life, with no way for individuals to meaningfully respond.
4. Accountability and Transparency
While drone use is expanding rapidly, oversight has lagged behind. Regulatory frameworks like those from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have focused primarily on issues like airspace safety, registration, and flight restrictions.
There are more than one million drones lawfully registered with the FAA in the United States and there are thousands of commercial, hobbyist and law enforcement drones lawfully in the sky on any given day. With the technology landscape evolving, we expect that number to increase over time.
US Department of Defense
However, what’s missing are clear rules governing how drones are used for surveillance purposes, particularly when it comes to collecting and handling data.
Today, most drone operators, whether they are private companies, law enforcement agencies, or individuals, are not required to disclose the purpose of their flights, the nature of the data they collect, or how that data will be used. Public visibility into these operations is minimal. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for communities to understand the scope of surveillance activities happening around them, let alone hold anyone accountable for overreach or misuse.
In some cases, drone footage has been used in criminal investigations, workplace monitoring, or even targeted advertising—all without formal policies requiring disclosure or public oversight. These uses may be legal under current rules, but they raise important ethical concerns about power, consent, and visibility.
Proposed solutions include mandatory disclosure of surveillance operations, public registries of drone flight activity, audit logs of data access, and third-party oversight for government use. These tools won’t eliminate risk, but they offer a foundation for transparency and accountability.
5. Algorithmic Bias and Environmental Justice
As drones become more autonomous, they are increasingly guided by algorithms used to recognize faces, identify objects, and flag “unusual” behavior. While automation can improve efficiency, it also introduces a risk of bias, especially when AI models are trained on datasets that don’t reflect the full range of human diversity.
Facial recognition systems, for example, have been shown to misidentify people of color at higher rates than white individuals. If these systems are deployed via drones, especially in surveillance-heavy areas, the result may be disproportionate targeting of certain populations. This concern is particularly acute in cities and neighborhoods that already experience heightened law enforcement presence.
Environmental justice also intersects with drone usage. Certain communities, often lower-income or historically marginalized, may be more heavily monitored due to zoning, policy decisions, or assumptions about public safety. In contrast, other areas might see drone use geared toward convenience or personal security. This uneven deployment risks reinforcing systemic inequalities under the guise of technological efficiency.
To address these challenges, drone developers and operators must engage in bias auditing, inclusive data training, and equitable policy planning. Surveillance tools should not amplify disparities—they should be designed with fairness and accountability in mind from the start.
Conclusion
Drone technology offers real promise for public safety, environmental monitoring, logistics, and more. But as drones' role in surveillance grows, so too do the ethical and operational challenges. Privacy, data security, transparency, consent, and equity are no longer side concerns—they are central to responsible drone use.
Establishing clear, enforceable policies and encouraging cross-sector collaboration between regulators, technologists, and civil society will be essential. If thoughtfully managed, drones can serve as powerful tools without compromising individual rights or public trust. But without deliberate safeguards, they risk becoming a silent and pervasive form of oversight that few fully understand—and even fewer can challenge.
What are the rules to fly your drone in 2025?
Want to Learn More?
If you're interested in the evolving relationship between drone technology and privacy rights, here are a few areas worth exploring next:
Download your PDF copy now!
References and Further Reading
-
Siddiqui, H. R., & Muniza, M. (2025). Regulatory Gaps in Drone Surveillance: Addressing Privacy, Security, and Manufacturing Standards. Annals of Human and Social Sciences, 6(1), 415–428. DOI: 10.35484/ahss.2025(6-I)36. https://ojs.ahss.org.pk/journal/article/view/946
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.