Robots are no longer confined to the back corner of a factory. They’re mobile, networked, data-driven, and deeply embedded in how modern manufacturing runs. But there’s a catch: every sensor, wireless link, and remote update port is a potential entry point for attackers.1-7
Industry 4.0 didn’t just bring smarter machines; it cracked open the industrial floor to a new class of cybersecurity threats. And unlike the air-gapped PLCs of the past, today’s robots are always on, always connected—and far too often, unprotected.
If we’re going to rely on robots to build everything from cars to microchips, we’d better make sure they’re secure.
Image Credit: SomYuZu/Shutterstock.com
Download your PDF copy now!
The Real Threats Lurking in Connected Manufacturing
The real cybersecurity threats in connected manufacturing aren’t always obvious. You don’t need a system-wide failure to feel the impact—small changes in sensor data, unexpected delays, or subtle misconfigurations can quietly disrupt production, compromise product quality, and introduce safety risks. These kinds of low-visibility issues are harder to detect, but they’re just as damaging.1-3
IIoT: A Fragile First Layer
At the core of connected manufacturing are IIoT devices, especially sensors in the “sensing layer” of operations. These devices enable real-time data collection, but they’re also among the most vulnerable. Attacks can take many forms, from physical tampering and credential theft to denial-of-service (DoS) attacks that jam wireless signals or distort data.
The real risk often lies in how easy it is to overlook these entry points. Poorly secured or misconfigured sensors can be hijacked and used to deliver malware, launch distributed DoS (DDoS) attacks, or even extract encrypted data. In some cases, attackers use them to quietly map networks and probe for deeper vulnerabilities, often going unnoticed until damage has already occurred.1
While more complex attacks like wormholes or Sybil impersonation exist, most real-world incidents exploit weak authentication, default credentials, or insecure ports. These simple oversights can have an outsized impact, making them a top priority for mitigation.
Once attackers gain access to an industrial network, they can exploit a wide range of attack vectors. DoS and spoofing attacks can degrade system performance or mislead connected devices. In more advanced cases, sinkhole and wormhole attacks manipulate routing paths, allowing attackers to redirect or drop critical data.
Other threats, such as flooding, Sybil attacks, and node replication, can overload systems or impersonate legitimate devices, flooding the network with false data and making detection difficult. These aren’t rare edge cases; they’ve been documented in real-world environments, including cases where compromised nodes led to manufacturing inconsistencies and unexpected downtime.
In 2021, a ransomware attack on a major automotive supplier forced production to halt across multiple sites, costing millions in lost output. While the breach began with compromised remote access, lateral movement through connected systems turned a single weak point into a facility-wide failure.1
Robots on the Network: High Stakes, Low Protection
Industrial robots have become smarter and more capable, but many are still running software and firmware that lack proper security controls. Devices often use outdated code, rely on default login credentials, or expose USB and network ports without adequate safeguards. These gaps are especially dangerous during maintenance, where technician laptops might be connected directly to systems, sometimes without antivirus protection or access control.
Many of these robots operate on the Robot Operating System (ROS), a powerful but inherently unsecured framework. While ROS supports rapid development and integration, it offers no built-in authentication or encryption, leaving protection up to the user. Wireless connections, often added for convenience, can be unsecured or unknown to operators, further expanding the attack surface.2
Inconsistent identity and access management (IAM) makes matters worse. Shared credentials, weak password policies, and poor login practices continue to be common. And as robots become part of larger, more autonomous networks, these vulnerabilities don’t just threaten individual machines—they can compromise entire workflows.2
Industrial Control Systems (ICS): Built for Isolation, Now Online
ICS platforms used to be physically separated from the internet and corporate networks. But with the rise of remote management and cloud integration, they’re now exposed in ways that earlier designs never accounted for.
Many ICS environments still run on outdated systems, with zero-day vulnerabilities that are hard—or impossible—to patch. Malware, privilege escalation, and passive data monitoring can disrupt device behavior, steal operational data, or silently interfere with critical controls.3
The convenience of mobile access for operators adds another layer of complexity. Without tight access policies and regular audits, attackers can exploit mobile endpoints as easy entry points into the broader industrial network.3
Core Strategies for Securing Connected Manufacturing
Despite the range of threats, the path to securing Industry 4.0 isn’t vague. The most effective defenses are built around three key strategies: segmentation, encryption, and real-time monitoring.
1. Network Segmentation: Isolating the Impact
Network segmentation is one of the most practical ways to reduce risk. By dividing networks into isolated zones—each with its own access controls—you can contain breaches and prevent them from spreading across systems. This is especially important in IIoT and robotics environments, where different components may have vastly different risk profiles.
Proper segmentation makes it easier to enforce policies, limit unnecessary access, and align system privileges with actual roles. It also simplifies compliance by clearly defining security boundaries and isolating sensitive operations.4,5
When combined with micro-segmentation, firewalls, and identity federation, segmentation becomes even more powerful. Frameworks like SiNeSF can help structure this approach, offering practical ways to manage access without limiting operational performance.5
2. Encryption: Securing Data at Every Stage
Encryption remains a cornerstone of industrial cybersecurity. In connected manufacturing environments, encryption protects communication between IIoT devices, robotic systems, and cloud infrastructure. Whether it's real-time sensor data or control signals, encrypting both stored and transmitted information makes unauthorized access significantly more difficult.
Techniques like public-key encryption can help secure device communications, while multiple SSIDs and encrypted routing paths add protection for cloud-based operations. Regularly updating encryption protocols—and training employees to use them properly—ensures these protections remain effective over time.1,3,6
3. Real-Time Monitoring: Responding Before Damage Spreads
Real-time monitoring provides the visibility needed to detect threats early. This includes tracking device behavior, analyzing traffic patterns, and identifying anomalies that signal a potential breach. For example, monitoring routing activity can help detect sinkhole or wormhole attacks, while identity validation can catch spoofed or unauthorized nodes.
Sensor data, in addition to supporting production, also plays a key role in intrusion detection. When paired with intelligent monitoring systems, it becomes possible to spot subtle deviations that may indicate tampering or network compromise. In robotics environments, integrating monitoring tools directly into control systems helps reduce response time and limit the impact of a breach.1,3,7
Final Thoughts
Industry 4.0 has brought new levels of flexibility and intelligence to manufacturing, but that progress comes with new risks. As robots, sensors, and control systems become more interconnected, cybersecurity is no longer optional.
Securing these environments starts with a clear understanding of the threat landscape and a commitment to layered, proactive defenses. Network segmentation, encryption, and real-time monitoring form the foundation of that effort, helping manufacturers protect data, maintain uptime, and ensure safe, reliable operations.
For organizations aligning with international standards, frameworks like ISO/IEC 27001 and IEC 62443 provide valuable guidance for managing cybersecurity in operational technology environments.
Interested in Strengthening Your Robotics Cybersecurity Strategy? Explore more:
Subscribe to our newsletter to read more articles on these sorts of topics!
Download your PDF copy now!
References and Further Reading
- Humayun, M., Jhanjhi, N. Z., Talib, M. N., Shah, M. H., Sussendran, G. (2021). Industry 4.0 and cyber security issues and challenges. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(10), 2957-2971. https://turcomat.org/index.php/turkbilmat/article/view/4946
- Industrial Robotics and Cybersecurity: How Manufacturers Can Minimize Risk and Ensure Safe Operation [Online] Available at https://www.aem.org/news/industrial-robotics-and-cybersecurity-how-manufacturers-can-minimize-risk-and-ensure-safe-operation (Accessed on 14 July 2025)
- Mullet, V., Sondi, P., Ramat, E. (2021). A review of cybersecurity guidelines for manufacturing factories in industry 4.0. IEEE Access, 9, 23235-23263. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056650, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9345803
- Naik, A. S., Aishwarya., Goud, A., NM, Amulya. (2024). A Review of the Role of Network Segmentation in Improving Cybersecurity and Preventing Data Breaches. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 27-35. DOI: 10.48175/IJARSCT-22806, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387292895_A_Review_of_the_Role_of_Network_Segmentation_in_Improving_Cybersecurity_and_Preventing_Data_Breaches
- Baligodugula, V. V., Ghimire, A., Amsaad, F. (2024). An overview of secure network segmentation in connected iiot environments. Computing &AI Connect, 1(1), 1-10. DOI: 10.69709/CAIC.2024.193182, https://www.scifiniti.com/3006-4163/1/2024.0004
- Avdibasic, E., Toksanovna, A. S., Durakovic, B. (2022). Cybersecurity challenges in Industry 4.0: A state of the art review. Defense and Security Studies, 3, 32-49. DOI: 10.37868/dss.v3.id188, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362884521_Cybersecurity_challenges_in_Industry_40_A_state_of_the_art_review
- Atanov, S. K., Seilkhanova, K. Z., Seitkulov, Y. N., Aljawarneh, S. A. (2023). Analysis and Prospects for Ensuring the Cybersecurity of Industrial Robots. DTESI 2023: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Digital Technologies in Education, Science and Industry. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3680/Short9.pdf
Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.