XDR vs EDR: Strengthening Cybersecurity for Robotic Systems

Download your free PDF copy of the article now to learn more!

The Evolving Threat Landscape for Robotic Systems

Robotic systems are becoming standard in fields like manufacturing, healthcare, and defense. As their presence grows, so does the interest from threat actors looking to exploit them. These aren’t just IT assets—they control physical processes, interact with people, and often operate in sensitive environments.

Modern robots rely on connected infrastructure: cloud platforms, AI models, wireless networks, and real-time data feeds. This makes them more capable, but also more exposed. Every new connection point adds another surface for potential attacks.

We’re seeing threats range from targeted malware and ransomware to insider misuse and unsecured network access. What makes this especially challenging is the mix of technologies involved. Robotics often sits between traditional IT systems and operational technology, which means standard security tools don’t always provide full coverage.

That gap is driving the need for more tailored protection. EDR and XDR are increasingly being used to monitor activity, detect threats early, and respond quickly—before small issues turn into operational failures.^2,3

EDR in Robotic Cybersecurity

EDR has been the go-to for endpoint protection in many industries, and robotics is no exception. These systems rely on dozens, sometimes hundreds, of connected components, and when something goes wrong at the device level, it needs to be caught fast. That’s where EDR fits in.

In a robotics context, “endpoint” can mean a lot of things: a controller running real-time code, a sensor feeding back data, or even a maintenance interface. EDR keeps an eye on these devices, looking for signs that something’s off—unusual processes, strange login activity, or unexpected changes in how the system behaves.

What makes EDR valuable here isn’t just that it catches threats—though that matters. It’s that it gives security teams context. If a robotic arm suddenly starts receiving commands outside its normal pattern, or if a new process appears on a device that rarely changes, EDR can highlight that quickly, giving teams a chance to respond before anything breaks.

The tech behind it has matured too. Early EDR tools were mostly signature-based and reactive. Now, most platforms rely on behavioral analysis, machine learning, and even memory-level monitoring. That helps with newer attack types like fileless malware or targeted attempts to interfere with robotic firmware. And as more robots connect to cloud services or external systems, cloud-native EDR has become more important. It’s lighter, easier to scale, and better suited to distributed environments.

But EDR isn’t perfect. False positives are still a challenge, especially in robotics, where “normal” can vary a lot between systems. There’s also the risk of overloading teams with too many alerts, or worse, training models on bad data that creates blind spots. These are manageable, but they require tuning and, frankly, human oversight.

Still, for teams working with connected robots—whether on a factory floor or in a hospital—EDR provides a baseline level of awareness that’s hard to do without. It helps you see what’s happening at the edge, understand why it’s happening, and decide what to do next. And in environments where a delay can mean downtime, or worse, that kind of visibility is hard to ignore.

XDR: Extending Security Beyond the Endpoint

While EDR focuses on what’s happening on the device itself, XDR pulls back to look at the bigger picture. It connects data from endpoints, networks, cloud services, user accounts, and applications, giving security teams a way to see how threats move across systems, not just where they land.

That broader view matters in robotics. These systems rarely operate in isolation. A single robot might interact with cloud-based monitoring tools, authentication services, OT networks, and external APIs—all at once. If something goes wrong, it’s often not contained to one endpoint. XDR is built to handle that kind of complexity.

At its core, XDR brings multiple data sources into one place. That might include logs from endpoint devices, network telemetry, cloud workload activity, and even email traffic. Then it layers on analytics, machine learning, and threat intelligence to help make sense of it all. Instead of chasing one-off alerts, teams can see how different signals relate and spot attacks that would otherwise fly under the radar.

This makes XDR especially useful in detecting multi-stage attacks. For example, an attacker might compromise a less critical robot, use that to move laterally across the network, and eventually gain access to more sensitive systems. EDR might catch part of that, but XDR helps connect the dots. And because many platforms now offer automated response actions, it’s possible to contain threats across systems, not just at the endpoint where they first appeared.

Another benefit is centralized control. With XDR, teams can manage incidents, apply policies, and monitor activity from a single dashboard. That’s a huge advantage when dealing with distributed robotic environments, especially ones spread across different sites or relying on remote connectivity.

Of course, like any security tool, XDR isn’t plug-and-play. It depends on good data, tuned detection logic, and a clear understanding of the systems being protected. But when done right, it becomes a powerful layer—one that helps teams see beyond isolated incidents and focus on the patterns that really matter.

Applications in Healthcare, Industrial, and Defense Robotics

The impact of EDR and XDR becomes most obvious when you look at how they’re used in the real world. Robotic systems operate under different constraints depending on the industry, but the security challenges often come down to the same things: uptime, safety, and visibility across complex environments.

Healthcare

In hospitals and surgical centers, robotic systems are increasingly involved in patient care, whether that be robotic-assisted surgery or automated dispensing systems. That means security incidents don’t just affect operations—they can put lives at risk.

EDR helps by monitoring robotic endpoints for unauthorized access, malware, or unusual behavior. XDR adds a layer of context, correlating activity across devices, user accounts, and network traffic. Some hospitals using both have seen faster detection times and fewer regulatory headaches thanks to improved auditing and response workflows.

Industrial environments

In manufacturing, robotics plays a central role in production lines, inventory movement, and quality control. The stakes here include production downtime, equipment damage, and theft of IP. EDR focuses on the individual machines—watching control units, PLCs, and connected endpoints—while XDR tracks how threats move across networks that connect HMIs, cloud services, and third-party vendor access. When these systems are integrated well, they can catch issues like logic manipulation or remote access abuse before they impact output or safety.

Defense

Military robotics operate in some of the most demanding environments—remote, high-risk, and often disconnected from traditional IT support. These systems are also prime targets for advanced persistent threats. EDR offers local protection for devices in the field, while XDR helps coordinate detection and response across a much broader landscape, including secure networks, command centers, and identity systems. The goal here isn’t just protection—it’s ensuring operational integrity under pressure.

Advancements in AI for Threat Detection

AI and machine learning are now baked into most modern security tools, but in robotics, they serve a more specific purpose: making sense of complex, often noisy data in real time. Robots generate a constant stream of signals—sensor readings, control instructions, system logs—and AI helps surface the things that actually matter from a security perspective.

In the context of EDR and XDR, AI improves both detection and response. Instead of relying only on known attack patterns, machine learning models can identify behavior that falls outside expected norms—like a robotic arm executing commands outside of its usual sequence, or access attempts that don’t match a user’s typical behavior. These models get better over time, learning from past incidents and adapting to the environment.

In healthcare, for example, AI-driven threat detection can flag unusual activity during a robotic-assisted procedure—something that might be missed by more rigid rule-based systems. In manufacturing, it might detect a subtle change in how a machine operates that points to tampering or misconfiguration.

Real-time analytics also plays a role here. When AI is tied into XDR platforms, it can help predict how a threat might evolve across systems or which parts of the environment are most at risk. That allows teams to prioritize and act faster, sometimes before the attack fully unfolds.

As AI continues to mature, it’s also enabling robotic systems to adjust their own security posture dynamically. That doesn’t mean removing human oversight, but it does mean giving robots the ability to recognize when something’s off and respond in a way that buys time for a deeper investigation.

Integration Challenges and Future Directions

Bringing EDR and XDR into robotic systems isn’t always straightforward. These environments come with their own set of constraints—real-time processing, legacy hardware, proprietary interfaces—that don’t always play well with modern security tooling.

Many robots weren’t designed with cybersecurity in mind. Some still run on outdated operating systems or closed-loop controllers that don’t support standard monitoring agents. In high-stakes environments, even small performance hits can be unacceptable. If a security tool adds latency or drains compute resources, it can interfere with how the robot actually functions.

Then there’s the complexity of the environments themselves. Robotic systems often sit between IT and OT, combining industrial control logic with cloud APIs, remote access tools, and wireless networks. Getting full visibility across that mix is hard, especially when the systems come from different vendors, use different protocols, and aren’t easily standardized.

AI adds another layer of complexity. Many of the models used in EDR and XDR need significant data and computing resources to run effectively. That’s fine in the cloud, but less so on the edge. And while AI improves detection, it also raises questions about privacy, data ownership, and regulatory compliance, particularly in healthcare and consumer-facing robotics. Regulations like General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) don’t always account for the kinds of telemetry these systems collect.

Ultimately, the challenge isn’t just technical—it’s strategic. Security teams need to balance automation with human judgment, and avoid the trap of over-relying on AI to do the heavy lifting. The most effective use of EDR and XDR tends to come from a layered approach: one where tools provide early signals, but humans still guide the response, update the models, and decide what matters most in the moment.

Ethical and Legal Considerations

As robotic systems assume more responsibility and security tools become more autonomous, the ethical and legal implications start to carry more weight.

Privacy is one of the big concerns. Many robotics platforms collect sensitive data, whether it’s patient records, operational telemetry, or footage from onboard cameras. When EDR and XDR systems process that data to detect threats, questions naturally follow: Who owns the data? How long is it stored? Is it being used strictly for security, or repurposed for something else?

Compliance frameworks like GDPR and CCPA offer some guardrails, but they weren’t written with AI-driven robotic security in mind. That creates gray areas, especially when it comes to how data is collected, processed, and shared across cloud-based systems or third-party analytics platforms.⁷

There’s also the matter of accountability. If an AI model in an XDR platform makes the wrong call—misses a threat or triggers a false positive that disrupts operations—who’s responsible? The software vendor? The operator who deployed it? The organization that trained the model?

And finally, consent and transparency are becoming harder to manage. As security systems automate more decisions, there’s a growing need to clearly communicate what’s being monitored and how that data is used, especially in settings like healthcare, where patients and staff are directly affected.

These aren’t unsolvable problems, but they do require deliberate planning. Strong governance, clear policies, and ongoing review are key. Security tools should support, not sidestep, the ethical standards expected in safety-critical industries.

Conclusion

EDR and XDR are becoming central to securing robotic systems as they grow more connected, autonomous, and embedded in critical operations. EDR provides the visibility needed at the device level, helping teams catch threats early. XDR builds on that by connecting signals across networks, cloud platforms, and applications, offering a broader view of what's really happening.

Together, they help shift security from reactive to proactive. Teams get faster detection, better context, and a clearer path to response when something goes wrong.

That said, these tools aren’t plug-and-play. Effective use depends on understanding the systems involved, tuning the tech to fit, and staying mindful of issues like privacy, data governance, and human oversight.

As robotic systems continue to merge software, hardware, and connectivity in new ways, security strategies have to evolve with them. EDR and XDR are part of that shift—and for many robotics teams, they’re quickly becoming non-negotiable.

Want to learn more?

Here are a few related topics worth exploring:

• What are Adversarial Attacks?
• AI in Cybersecurity: Spotting Threats Faster and Smarter
• AI Liability and Accountability: Who is Responsible When AI Makes a Harmful Decision?

Download your free PDF copy now to learn more!

References and Further Reading

1. Karlekar, J. (2025). EDR vs XDR: Understanding the Differences and Choosing the Right Solution. Seqrite Blog. https://www.seqrite.com/blog/edr-vs-xdr-differences-choosing-right-solution/
2. Kaur, H. et al. (2024). Evolution of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) in Cyber Security: A Comprehensive Review. E3S Web of Conferences 556, 01006. DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202455601006. https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/abs/2024/86/e3sconf_rawmu2024_01006/e3sconf_rawmu2024_01006.html
3. Abed, M. S. et al. (2023). Security Vulnerabilities and Threats in Robotic Systems: A Comprehensive Review. International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, 13(3), 555–563. DOI:10.18280/ijsse.130318. https://www.iieta.org/journals/ijsse/paper/10.18280/ijsse.130318
4. Securing the Rising Endpoint Footprint: 10 EDR Technologies Leading the Charge Against Modern Threats. (2024). Cloud 4C. https://www.cloud4c.com/blogs/top-10-advancements-in-endpoint-detection-and-response
5. Gebremeskel, B. (2025). EDR vs. XDR: What’s the Difference? Teckpath. https://teckpath.com/edr-vs-xdr-difference/
6. Snyder, S. (2022). EDR vs XDR vs MDR: What’s the Difference? And Why Does It Matter? Secureworks. https://www.secureworks.com/blog/edr-vs-xdr-vs-mdr-whats-the-difference
7. Khan, M. J., & Karmakar, A. (2023). Emerging Robotic Innovations and Artificial Intelligence in Endotracheal Intubation and Airway Management: Current State of the Art. Cureus, 15(7), e42625. DOI:10.7759/cureus.42625. https://www.cureus.com/articles/173040-emerging-robotic-innovations-and-artificial-intelligence-in-endotracheal-intubation-and-airway-management-current-state-of-the-art#!/
8. Lekhi, A. (2025). xDR in Operational Technology: Approach and Adaption. ISA Global Cybersecurity Alliance. https://gca.isa.org/blog/xdr-in-operational-technology-approach-and-adaption

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the author expressed in their private capacity and do not necessarily represent the views of AZoM.com Limited T/A AZoNetwork the owner and operator of this website. This disclaimer forms part of the Terms and conditions of use of this website.