Posted in | News | Medical Robotics

Researchers Conduct Medical Analysis of Robotic Bladder Cancer Surgery

Surgical removal of cancerous bladder, based on robotic technology is a new technological advancement approach to the traditional open or invasive surgery such as radical cystectomy.

Dr. Jim Hu

According to a new study found in journal European Urology, robotic surgery shows increased patient survival than in open surgery. In robotic-assisted bladder surgery, smaller incisions are made posing reduced trauma to the patients. The surgeon gets a clear 3-D anatomical view during the procedure. This surgical procedure reduces the need for post-surgery intravenous nutrition. However, robotic-assisted procedures are expensive.

The director of minimally invasive surgery at UCLA’s department of urology, Dr. Jim Hu along with colleagues at Georgetown University Hospital and Harvard Medical School, conducted research using the U.S. Nationwide Inpatient Sample with data from 1,050 hospitals across 44 states. By investigating 1,444 traditional open surgeries and 224 robotic-assisted laparoscopic procedures conducted in 2009, the researchers found that 13% of all radical cystectomies in 2009 were done based on robotic technologies.

With the help of statistical analysis, the researchers collected and compared the two procedures based on hospital-level information such as complications, in-patient deaths, cost of procedure and hospital stay. The findings state that:

  • Open radical cystectomy showed 2.5% patient death in-hospital, which was absent in robotic surgery.
  • Patients with robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery showed fewer in-patient complications than with traditional open procedure (49.1% vs. 63.8%).
  • After the robotic procedure, only 6.4% patients required parenteral nutrition, while the statistics is 13.3% with open-surgery counterparts.
  • Both surgeries require eight days hospital stay.
  • Total surgical expenditure for the robotic procedure is over $3,000 more than traditional open surgery.
  • There are fewer women patients opting robotic procedure.
  • Around 95.7% of robotic procedures and 73.9% of traditional procedures were conducted at teaching hospitals.
  • Key lymph nodes were removed for 76.8% patients in robotic procedure and 67% in open procedure, during surgery.

Source: http://www.ucla.edu/

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Choi, Andy. (2019, February 20). Researchers Conduct Medical Analysis of Robotic Bladder Cancer Surgery. AZoRobotics. Retrieved on May 01, 2024 from https://www.azorobotics.com/News.aspx?newsID=2678.

  • MLA

    Choi, Andy. "Researchers Conduct Medical Analysis of Robotic Bladder Cancer Surgery". AZoRobotics. 01 May 2024. <https://www.azorobotics.com/News.aspx?newsID=2678>.

  • Chicago

    Choi, Andy. "Researchers Conduct Medical Analysis of Robotic Bladder Cancer Surgery". AZoRobotics. https://www.azorobotics.com/News.aspx?newsID=2678. (accessed May 01, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Choi, Andy. 2019. Researchers Conduct Medical Analysis of Robotic Bladder Cancer Surgery. AZoRobotics, viewed 01 May 2024, https://www.azorobotics.com/News.aspx?newsID=2678.

Tell Us What You Think

Do you have a review, update or anything you would like to add to this news story?

Leave your feedback
Your comment type
Submit

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.